[Pg 41]
The boys argued mightily12 about these unorthodox swishings. It was all a part of Sanderson being a strange creature and not in the tradition. It was lucky no one was ever injured. But they found something in their own unregenerate natures that made them understand and sympathise with this eager, thwarted13 stranger and his thunderstorms of anger. Generally he was a genial14 person, and that, too, they recognised. It is manifest quite early in the story that Sanderson interested his boys as his predecessor15 had never done. They discussed his motives16, his strange sayings, his peculiar17 locutions with accumulating curiosity. Two sorts of schoolmasters boys respect: those who are completely dignified and opaque18 to them, and those who are transparent19 enough to show honesty at the core. Sanderson was transparently20 honest. If he was not pompously21 dignified he was also extraordinarily22 free from vanity; and if he thrust work and toil23 upon his boys it was at any rate not to spare himself that he did so. And he won them also by his wonderful teaching. In the early days he did a lot of the science teaching himself; later on the school grew too big for him to do any of this.[Pg 42] All the old boys I have been able to consult agree that his class instruction was magnificent.
Every year in the history of Sanderson's headmastership shows a growing understanding between the boys and himself. 'Beans,' they called him, but every year it was less and less necessary to 'Give 'm Beans,' as the vulgar say. The tale of storms and thrashings dwindles24 until it vanishes from the story. In the last decade of his rule there was hardly any corporal punishment at all. The whole school as time went on grew into a humorous affectionate appreciation25 of his genius. It was a sunny, humorous school when I knew it; there was little harshness and no dark corners. No boy had been expelled for a long time.