I started the next morning to call upon St. Leonard.  Near to the house I encountered young Hopkins on a horse.  He was waving a pitchfork over his head and reciting “The Charge of the Light Brigade.”  The horse looked amused.  He told me I should find “the gov’nor” up by the stables.  St. Leonard is not an “old man.”  Dick must have seen him in a bad light.  I should describe him as about the prime of life, a little older than myself, but nothing to speak of.  Dick was right, however, in saying he was not like a farmer.  To begin with, “Hubert St. Leonard” does not sound like a farmer.  One can imagine a man with a name like that writing a book about farming, having theories on this subject.  But in the ordinary course of nature things would not grow for him.  He does not look like a farmer.  One cannot say what it is, but there is that about a farmer that tells you he is a farmer.  The farmer has a way of leaning over a gate.  There are not many ways of leaning over a gate.  I have tried all I could think of, but it was never quite the right way.  It has to be in the blood.  A farmer has a way of on one leg and looking at a thing that isn’t there.  It sounds simple, but there is in it.  The farmer is not surprised it is not there.  He never expected it to be there.  It is one of those things that ought to be, and is not.  The farmer’s life is full of such.  Suffering reduced to a science is what the farmer stands for.  All his life he is the good man struggling against adversity.  Nothing his way comes right.  This does not seem to be his planet.  means well, but she does not understand farming.  She is doing her best, he supposes; that she is a born muddler is not her fault.  If Providence could only step down for a month or two and take a few lessons in practical farming, things might be better; but this being out of the question there is nothing more to be said.  From conversation with farmers one up a picture of Providence as a well-intentioned amateur, put into a position for which she is unsuited.  
“Rain,” says Providence, “they are wanting rain.  What did I do with that rain?”
 
She finds the rain and starts it, and is pleased with herself until some Wandering Spirit pauses on his way and asks her what she thinks she’s doing.
 
“Raining,” explains Providence.  “They wanted rain—farmers, you know, that sort of people.”
 
“They won’t want anything for long,” retorts the Spirit.  “They’ll be drowned in their beds before you’ve done with them.”
 
“Don’t say that!” says Providence.
 
“Well, have a look for yourself if you won’t believe me,” says the Spirit.  “You’ve spoilt that harvest again, you’ve ruined all the fruit, and you are rotting even the .  Don’t you ever learn by experience?”
 
“It is so difficult,” says Providence, “to regulate these things just right.”
 
“So it seems—for you,” retorts the Spirit.  “Anyhow, I should not rain any more, if I were you.  If you must, at least give them time to build another ark.”  And the Wandering Spirit continues on his way.
 
“The place does look a bit wet, now I come to notice it,” says Providence, peeping down over the edge of her star.  “Better turn on the fine weather, I suppose.”
 
She starts with she calls “set fair,” and feeling now that she is something like a Providence, composes herself for a .  She is startled out of her sleep by the return of the Wandering Spirit.
 
“Been down there again?” she asks him pleasantly.
 
“Just come back,” explains the Wandering Spirit.
 
“Pretty spot, isn’t it?” says Providence.  “Things nice and dry down there now, aren’t they?”
 
“You’ve hit it,” he answers.  “Dry is the word.  The rivers are dried up, the wells are dried up, the cattle are dying, the grass is all .  As for the harvest, there won’t be any harvest for the next two years!  Oh, yes, things are dry enough.”
 
One imagines Providence bursting into tears.  “But you suggested yourself a little fine weather.”
 
“I know I did,” answers the Spirit.  “I didn’t suggest a six months’ drought with the thermometer at a hundred and twenty in the shade.  Doesn’t seem to me that you’ve got any sense at all.”
 
“I do wish this job had been given to someone else,” says Providence.
 
“Yes, and you are not the only one to wish it,” retorts the Spirit unfeelingly.
 
“I do my best,” urges Providence, wiping her eyes with her wings.  “I am not fitted for it.”
 
“A truer word you never uttered,” retorts the Spirit.
 
“I try—nobody could try harder,” Providence.  “Everything I do seems to be wrong.”
 
“What you want,” says the Spirit, “is less enthusiasm and a little in place of it.  You get excited, and then you lose your head.  When you do send rain, ten to one you send it when it isn’t wanted.  You keep back your sunshine—just as a duffer at whist keeps back his trumps—until it is no good, and then you deal it out all at once.”
 
“I’ll try again,” said Providence.  “I’ll try quite hard this time.”
 
“You’ve been trying again,” retorts the Spirit unsympathetically, “ever since I have known you.  It is not that you do not try.  It is that you have not got the hang of things.  Why don’t you get yourself an almanack?”
 
The Wandering Spirit takes his leave.  Providence tells herself she really must get that almanack.  She ties a knot in her handkerchief.  It is not her fault: she was made like it.  She forgets altogether for what reason she tied that knot.  Thinks it was to remind her to send frosts in May, or mists in August.  She is not sure which, so sends both.  The farmer has ceased even to be angry with her—recognises that affliction and sorrow are good for his soul, and pursues his way in calmness to the Court.
 
Hubert St. Leonard, of Windrush Bottom Farm, I found to be a worried-looking gentleman.  He taps his weather-glass, and hopes and fears, not knowing as yet that all things have been ordered for his ill.  It will be years before his spirit is to that attitude of despair essential to the farmer: one feels it.  He is tall and thin, with a sensitive, mobile face, and a curious trick of taking his head every now and again between his hands, as if to be sure it is still there.  When I met him he was on the point of starting for his round, so I walked with him.  He told me that he had not always been a farmer.  Till a few years ago he had been a .  But he had always hated his office; and having saved a little, had when he came to forty to enjoy the rare luxury of living his own life.  I asked him if he found that farming paid.  He said:
 
“As in everything else, it depends upon the price you put upon yourself.  Now, as a casual observer, what wage per annum would you say I was worth?”
 
It was an awkward question.
 
“You are afraid that if you you would offend me,” he suggested.  “Very well.  For the purpose of explaining my theory let us take, instead, your own case.  I have read all your books, and I like them.  Speaking as an admirer, I should estimate you at five hundred a year.  You, perhaps, make two thousand, and consider yourself worth five.”
 
The whimsical smile with which he accompanied the speech me.
 
“What we most of us do,” he continued, “is to over-capitalise ourselves.  John Smith, honestly worth a hundred a year, claims to be worth two.  Result: difficulty of earning , over-work, over-worry, constant fear of being wound up.  Now, there is that about your work that suggests to me you would be happier earning five hundred a year than you ever will be earning two thousand.  To pay your dividend—to earn your two thousand—you have to do work that brings you no pleasure in the doing.  Content with five hundred, you could afford to do only that work that does give you pleasure.  This is not a perfect world, we must remember.  In the perfect world the thinker would be worth more than the jester.  In the perfect world the farmer would be worth more than the stockbroker.  In making the exchange I had to write myself down.  I earn less money, but get more out of life.  I used to be able to afford , but my liver was always wrong, and I dared not drink it.  Now I cannot afford champagne, but I enjoy my beer.  That is my theory, that we are all of us entitled to payment according to our market value, neither more nor less.  You can take it all in cash.  I used to.  Or you can take less cash and more fun: that is what I am getting now.”
 
“It is ,” I said, “to meet with a philosopher.  One hears about them, of course; but I had got it into my mind they were all dead.”
 
“People laugh at philosophy,” he said.  “I never could understand why.  It is the science of living a free, peaceful, happy existence.  I would give half my remaining years to be a philosopher.”
 
“I am not laughing at philosophy,” I said.  “I honestly thought you were a philosopher.  I judged so from the way you talked.”
 
“Talked!” he retorted.  “Anybody can talk.  As you have just said, I talk like a philosopher.”
 
“But you not only talk,” I insisted, “you behave like a philosopher.  Sacrificing your income to the joy of living your own life!  It is the act of a philosopher.”
 
I wanted to keep him in good humour.  I had three things to talk to him about: the cow, the donkey, and Dick.
 
“No, it wasn’t,” he answered.  “A philosopher would have remained a stockbroker and been just as happy.  Philosophy does not depend upon environment.  You put the philosopher down anywhere.  It is all the same to him, he takes his philosophy with him.  You can suddenly tell him he is an emperor, or give him servitude for life.  He goes on being a philosopher just as if nothing had happened.  We have an old tom-cat.  The children lead it an awful life.  It does not seem to matter to the cat.  They shut it up in the piano: their idea is that it will make a noise and frighten someone.  It doesn’t make a noise; it goes to sleep.  When an hour later someone opens the piano, the poor thing is lying there stretched out upon the keyboard purring to itself.  They dress it up in the baby’s clothes and take it out in the perambulator: it lies there looking round at the scenery—takes in the fresh air.  They haul it about by its tail.  You would think, to watch it swinging gently to and fro head , that it was grateful to them for giving it a new sensation.  it looks on everything that comes its way as helpful experience.  It lost a leg last winter in a trap: it goes about quite cheerfully on three.  Seems to be rather pleased, if anything, at having lost the fourth—saves washing.  Now, he is your true philosopher, that cat; never minds what happens to him, and is equally contented if it doesn’t.”
 
I found myself becoming fretful.  I know a man with whom it is impossible to disagree.  Men at the Club—new-comers—have been into taking bets that they could on any topic under the sun find themselves out of sympathy with him.  They have denounced Mr. Lloyd George as a to his country.  This man has risen and shaken them by the hand, words being too weak to express his of their fearlessness.  You might have thought them Nihilists denouncing the Russian Government from the steps of the Kremlin at Moscow.  They have, in the next breath, abused Mr. Balfour in terms the law of .  He has almost fallen on their necks.  It has that the one dream of his life was to hear Mr. Balfour abused.  I have talked to him myself for a quarter of an hour, and gathered that at heart he was a peace-at-any-price man, strongly in favour of Conscription, a Republican, with a deep-rooted contempt for the working classes.  It is not bad sport to collect half a dozen and talk round him.  At such times he suggests the family dog that six people from different parts of the house are calling to at the same time.  He wants to go to them all at once.
 
I felt I had got to understand this man, or he would worry me.
 
“We are going to be neighbours,” I said, “and I am inclined to think I shall like you.  That is, if I can get to know you.  You commence by enthusing on philosophy: I hasten to agree with you.  It is a noble science.  When my youngest daughter has grown up, when the other one has learnt a little sense, when Dick is off my hands, and the British public has come to appreciate good literature, I am hoping to be a bit of a philosopher myself.  But before I can explain to you my views you have already changed your own, and are likening the philosopher to an old tom-cat that seems to be weak in his head.  Soberly now, what are you?”
 
“A fool,” he answered ; “a most unfortunate fool.  I have the mind of a philosopher coupled to an intensely .  My philosophy teaches me to be ashamed of my , and my irritability makes my philosophy appear to be nonsense to myself.  The philosopher in me tells me it does not matter when the twins fall down the wishing-well.  It is not a deep well.  It is not the first time they have fallen into it: it will not be the last.  Such things pass: the philosopher only smiles.  The man in me calls the philosopher a blithering idiot for saying it does not matter when it does matter.  Men have to be called away from their work to haul them out.  We all of us get wet.  I get wet and excited, and that always starts my liver.  The children’s clothes are utterly spoilt.  Confound them,”—the blood was mounting to his head—“they never care to go near the well except they are dressed in their best clothes.  On other days they will stop indoors and read Foxe’s ‘Book of .’  There is something uncanny about twins.  What is it?  Why should twins be worse than other children?  The ordinary child is not an angel, Heaven knows.  Take these boots of mine.  Look at them; I have had them for over two years.  I tramp ten miles a day in them; they have been soaked through a hundred times.  You buy a boy a pair of boots—”
 
“Why don’t you cover over the well?” I suggested.
 
“There you are again,” he replied.  “The philosopher in me—the sensible man—says, ‘What is the good of the well?  It is nothing but mud and rubbish.  Something is always falling into it—if it isn’t the children it’s the pigs.  Why not do away with it?’”
 
“Seems to be sound advice,” I commented.
 
“It is,” he agreed.  “No man alive has more sound commonsense than I have, if only I were capable of listening to myself.  Do you know why I don’t brick in that well?  Because my wife told me I would have to.  It was the first thing she said when she saw it.  She says it again every time anything does fall into it.  ‘If only you would take my advice’—you know the sort of thing.  Nobody irritates me more than the person who says, ‘I told you so.’  It’s a old ruin: it used to be haunted.  That’s all been knocked on the head since we came.  What self-respecting nymph can haunt a well into which children and pigs are for ever ?”
 
He laughed; but before I could join him he was angry again.  “Why should I block up an historic well, that is an to the garden, because a pack of fools can’t keep a gate shut?  As for the children, what they want is a thorough good whipping, and one of these days—”
 
A voice crying to us to stop interrupted him.
 
“Am on my round.  Can’t come,” he shouted.
 
“But you must,” explained the voice.
 
He turned so quickly that he almost knocked me over.  “Bother and confound them all!” he said.  “Why don’t they keep to the time-table?  There’s no system in this place.  That is what ruins farming—want of system.”
 
He went on as he walked.  I followed him.  across the field we met the owner of the voice.  She was a pleasant-looking lass, not exactly pretty—not the sort of girl one turns to look at in a crowd—yet, having seen her, it was agreeable to continue looking at her.  St. Leonard introduced me to her as his daughter, Janie, and explained to her that behind the study door, if only she would take the trouble to look, she would find a time-table—
 
“According to which,” replied Miss Janie, with a smile, “you ought at the present moment to be in the rick-yard, which is just where I want you.”
 
“What time is it?” he asked, feeling his waistcoat for a watch that appeared not to be there.
 
“Quarter to eleven,” I told him.
 
He took his head between his hands.  “Good God!” he cried, “you don’t say that!”
 
The new , Miss Janie told us, had just arrived.  She was anxious her father should see it was in working order before the men went back.  “Otherwise,” so she argued, “old Wilkins will persist it was all right when he delivered it, and we shall have no remedy.”
 
We turned towards the house.
 
“Speaking of the practical,” I said, “there were three things I came to talk to you about.  First and foremost, that cow.”
 
“Ah, yes, the cow,” said St. Leonard.  He turned to his daughter.  “It was Maud, was it not?”
 
“No,” she answered, “it was Susie.”
 
“It is the one,” I said, “that most all night and three parts of the day.  Your boy Hopkins thinks maybe she’s .”
 
“Poor soul!” said St. Leonard.  “We only took her away from her—when did we take her calf away from her?” he asked of Janie.
 
“On Thursday morning,” returned Janie; “the day we sent her over.”
 
............