New Lights.

A few days later ‘Jos. Larkin, Esq., The Lodge, Gylingden,’ received from London a printed form, duly filled in, and with the official signature attached, informing him that enquiry having been instituted in consequence of his letter, no result had been obtained.

The hiatus in his correspondence caused Mr. Larkin extreme uneasiness. He had a profound distrust of Captain Lake. In fact, he thought him capable of everything. And if there should turn out to be anything not quite straight going on at the post-office of Gylingden — hitherto an unimpeached institution — he had no doubt whatsoever that that dark and sinuous spirit was at the bottom of it.

Still it was too prodigious, and too hazardous to be probable; but the captain had no sort of principle, and a desperately strong head. There was not, indeed, when they met yesterday, the least change or consciousness in the captain’s manner. That, in another man, would have indicated something; but Stanley Lake was so deep — such a mask — in him it meant nothing.

Mr. Larkin’s next step was to apply for a commissioner to come down and investigate. But before he had time to take this step, an occurrence took place to arrest his proceedings. It was the receipt of a foreign letter, of which the following is an exact copy:—

‘VENICE: March 28.

‘DEAR LARKIN — I read a rumour of a dissolution during the recess. Keep a bright look out. Here’s three things for you:—

‘1. Try and get Tom Wealdon. He is a sina que non. [Mark’s Latin was sailor-like.]

‘2. Cash the enclosed order for 150_l. more, for the same stake.

‘3. Tell Martin the tiles I saw in August last will answer for the cow-house; and let him put them down at once.

‘In haste,

‘Yours truly,

‘M. WYLDER.’

Enclosed was an order on Lake for 150_l.

When Larkin got this he was in his study.

‘Why — why — this — positively this is the letter. How’s this?’

And Mr. Larkin looked as much scared and astonished as if a spirit rose up before him.

‘This is the letter — aye, this is the letter.’

He repeated this from time to time as he turned it over and looked at the postmark, and back again at the letter, and looked up at the date, and down at the signature, and read the note through.

‘Yes, this is it — here it is — this is it. There’s no doubt whatever — this is the letter referred to in the last — Wealdon, Martin, and the 150_l.’

And the attorney took out his keys, looking pale and stern, like a man about to open the door upon a horror, and unlocked his safe, and took out the oft-consulted and familiar series — letters tied up and bearing the label, ‘Mark Wylder, Esq.’

‘Aye, here it is, Genoa, 20th, and this, Venice, 28th. Yes, the postmarks correspond; yet the letter from Genoa, dated 20th, refers back to the letter from Venice, written eight days later! the — Well — I can’t comprehend — how in the name of — how in the name ——’

He placed the two letters on his desk, and read them over, and up and down, and pondered darkly over them.

‘It is Mark Wylder’s writing — I’ll swear to it. What on earth can he mean? He can’t possibly want to confuse us upon dates, as well as places, because that would simply render his letters, for purposes of business, nugatory, and there are many things he wishes attended to.’

Jos. Larkin rose from his desk, ruminating, and went to the window, and placed the letter against the pane. I don’t think he had any definite motive in doing this, but something struck him that he had not remarked before.

There was something different in the quality of the ink that wrote the number of the date, 28th, from that used in the rest of the letter.

‘What can that mean?’ muttered Larkin, with a sort of gasp at his discovery; and shading his eyes with his hand, he scrutinised the numerals —‘28th,’ again; —‘a totally different ink!

He took the previous letter, frowned on it fiercely from his rat-like eyes, and then with an ejaculation, as like an oath as so good a man could utter, he exclaimed,

‘I have it!’

Then came a pause, and he said —

‘Both alike! — blanks left when the letters were written, and the dates filled in afterward — not the same hand I think — no, not the same — positively a different hand.’

Then Jos. Larkin examined these mysterious epistles once more.

‘There may be something in what Larcom said — a very great deal, possibly. If he was shut up somewhere they could make him write a set of these letters off at a sitting, and send them from place to place to be posted, to make us think he was travelling, and prevent our finding where they keep him. Here it is plain there was a slip in posting the wrong one first.’

Trepanned, kidnapped, hid away in the crypts of some remote mad-house — reduced to submission by privation and misery — a case as desperate as that of a prisoner in the Inquisition. What could be the motive for this elaborate and hideous fraud? Would it not be a more convenient course, as well as more merciful to put him to death? The crime would hardly be greater. Why should he be retained in that ghastly existence?

Well, if Stanley Lake were at the bottom of this horrid conspiracy, he certainly had a motive in clearing the field of his rival. And then — for the attorney had all the family settlements present to his mind — there was this clear motive for prolonging his life, that by the slip in the will under which Dorcas Brandon inherited, the bulk of her estate would terminate with the life of Mark Wylder; and this other motive too existed for retaining him in the house of bondage, that by preventing his marriage, and his having a family to succeed him, the reversion of his brother William was reduced to a certainty, and would become a magnificent investment for Stanley Lake whenever he might choose to purchase. Upon that purchase, however, the good attorney had cast his eye. He thought he now began to discern the outlines of a gigantic and symmetrical villainy emerging through the fog. If this theory were right, William Wylder’s reversion was certain to take effect; and it was exasperating that the native craft and daring of this inexperienced captain should forestall so accomplished a man of business as Jos. Larkin.

The attorney began to hate Stanley Lake as none but a man of that stamp can hate the person who mars a scheme of aggrandisement. But what was he to do exactly? If the captain had his eye on the reversion, it would require nice navigation to carry his plan successfully through.

On the other hand, it was quite possible that Wylder was a ............