No. 9.  
BY CHARLES W. PENROSE
 
In proclaiming the great truths that the silence of centuries has been broken; that the voice of God has again been heard from heaven; that Jesus Christ His Son has manifested Himself in these latter days; that Angels from the courts of glory have ministered to man on earth in the present age; that a sacred record has been brought forth from the ground disclosing the history of a hemisphere; and bearing the same truths as those recorded in the Bible; that a Prophet, Seer and Revelator has been raised up to bring in the last dispensation; that Apostles and other inspired servants of God now minister among them; that the Church of Christ with all its former organization, ordinances, gifts, signs and spiritual power has been reorganized on earth; and that communications may be had with Deity by men and women of faith now, as at any period in the world's history, the servants of God are met with the assertion that the day of revelation has long since passed, and that they must of necessity be either impostors or deluded, because there is to be no more scripture, prophecy, miracles, angelic ministrations, visions or actual communication from heaven to earth. This popular error is fostered and propagated by the ministers of various so-called Christian denominations, and is accepted by the masses of the people as a settled and foregone conclusion.
 
On what ground is such an irrational position assumed? Is not the Almighty declared in scripture to be unchangeable? Has not His work on earth always been conducted by men divinely chosen, appointed and inspired? Is there not as much need of divine revelation to settle religious feuds and doctrinal differences in the 19th century, as at any previous period? Would not the word of the Lord be of much more value to mankind than the varied opinions of uninspired men, no matter how great be their human learning? Ought {243} not the inhabitants of the earth to be not only willing, but eager to receive a message from the eternal worlds?
 
"Ah!" exclaims the objector, "but there were to be no more Prophets after Christ. He finished the divine plan and completed the revelation of God to the earth. He warned His disciples against false prophets and false Christs, and said if it were possible they would deceive the very elect." Does not the very fact Christ said there would be false prophets, convey the idea that there would be true Prophets also? If there were to be no more true Prophets, it would have been easy for the Savior to plainly say so, and thus there would be no place left for deceivers. But He declared emphatically: "Wherefore, behold I send unto you Prophets and wise men and scribes, and some of them ye shall kill and crucify, and some of them ye shall scourge in your synagogues and persecute them from city to city." (Matt. XXIII; 34.) Were not Prophets established in the Church of Christ as members of His body? Read I Cor. XII; 28: "And God hath set some in the Church; first Apostles, secondarily Prophets, thirdly, Teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healing, helps, governments, diversities of tongues." Did not Christ promise His disciples that after He went away the Comforter should come? And was not one of the offices of that spirit to show them "things to come?" (John XVI; 13.) Was not the gift of prophecy bestowed upon members of the Church of Christ as one of the manifestations of the Holy Spirit? (I Cor. XII; 10.) And can anybody possess the true testimony of Jesus without that spirit? The angel that appeared to John the Apostle said: "The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy." (Rev. XIX; 10.) Paul prayed for the Ephesians: "That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him." (Eph. I; 17.) If revelation and prophecy ceased with Christ, what about the New Testament, all written after His death and resurrection, by men now believed to be inspired? Did not the Apostle John behold a glorious vision and receive a grand revelation, when banished to the Island of Patmos?
 
Here again the objection will be raised: "But that revelation was the last communication from heaven, and its closing chapter forbids any further revelation." That is also a popular error promulgated by men professing to be ministers of Christ, and finding themselves destitute of divine power and inspiration. Here is the passage they quote: "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of {244} this book, if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book." (Rev. XXII; 18.) It is astonishing how plain and simple language can be wrested from its evident meaning to suit the purpose of sophistry. There is not a word in that text which conveys the remotest intimation that revelation and prophecy were to cease, or that God would no more speak to man. It is a prohibition against the addition by man of anything to that which God reveals. The next verse forbids the taking away of anything from the "book of this prophecy." That is, the Book of Revelation. These commands have reference to that one book, and that only. The compilers of the New Testament have placed it last in the collection of scriptural books, and the strained, unnatural and absurd application which has been made of the words we have quoted have been attached to the whole volume of the Bible. It is all wrong and ridiculous. The idea that the Almighty placed a seal upon His own mouth when He simply forbade men to add to what He said, is certainly most remarkable for sane people to entertain. If that singular notion were correct, then both the angel who gave the revelation, and John, who received it, violated the heavenly injunction, for we read that the angel gave to John a mission in figurative manner, which he thus explained: "Thou must prophecy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings." (Rev. X; 11.) It is well known that the Epistles of St. John were written after he received the revel............